This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bellezza, F. S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Mnemonic Devices: Classification, Characteristics, and Criteria

Ohio University

Abstract

In recent years the importance of mnemonic strategies in learning has been recognized. Through the use of special mnemonic devices some spectacular results in recall performance have been obtained. However, systematic research on mnemonic devices is only now starting to be done. Consequently, not much is known about techniques for optimizing recall performance with mnemonic devices or the suitability of using mnemonic devices in educational settings. To help remedy this situation four aspects of the study of mnemonic devices are discussed: (1) Reasons are given why research on mnemonic devices should be performed. (2) A system is outlined by which common mnemonic devices can be classified. (3) Because recall with mnemonic devices is mediated by cognitive cuing structures created by the user, properties are described which these cognitive cuing structures must have to be effective. The criteria of constructibility, discriminability, associability, and invertibility are discussed as important properties of cognitive cuing structures. The characterization of mnemonic devices as cognitive cuing structures possessing these properties is proposed as a step forward in the development of a theory of mnemonic devices. (4) Certain methodological problems are discussed which make some of the past research on mnemonic devices inconclusive with respect to questions concerning their effectiveness.

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 51, No. 2, 247-275 (1981)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543051002247


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. King-Sears, C. D. Mercer, and P. T. Sindelar Toward Independence with Keyword Mnemonics: A Strategy for Science Vocabulary Instruction Remedial and Special Education, September 1, 1992; 13(5): 22 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. K. Malhotra Mnemonics in Marketing: a Pedagogical Tool Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, March 1, 1991; 19(2): 141 - 149. [Abstract]

				J. R. Rachal Gutenberg, Literacy, and the Ancient Arts of Memory Adult Education Quarterly, September 1, 1988; 38(3): 125 - 135. [Abstract]

				M. A. Mastropieri, T. E. Scruggs, and J. R. Levin Learning-Disabled Students' Memory for Expository Prose: Mnemonic Versus Nonmnemonic Pictures American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1987; 24(4): 505 - 519. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Mastropieri, T. E. Scruggs, and J. R. Levin Maximizing What Exceptional Students Can Learn: A Review of Research on the Keyword Method and Related Mnemonic Techniques Remedial and Special Education, March 1, 1985; 6(2): 39 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. B. McCormick and J. R. Levin A Comparison of Different Prose-Learning Variations of the Mnemonic Keyword Method American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1984; 21(2): 379 - 398. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R Levin, L. K Shriberg, and J. K Berry A Concrete Strategy for Remembering Abstract Prose American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1983; 20(2): 277 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Pressley, J. R. Levin, and H. D. Delaney The Mnemonic Keyword Method Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1982; 52(1): 61 - 91. [Abstract] [PDF]