Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Educational Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haertel, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Articles

Construct Validity and Criterion-Referenced Testing

Edward Haertel

Stanford University

Construct validation is as important for the measurement of school outcomes as of constructs in personality or human abilities. A multifaceted inquiry is called for, bringing both psychological theory and empirical findings to bear upon the meaning of achievement test performance. It is proposed that achievement constructs be described in both psychological and behavioral terms, and this procedure is illustrated for the construct of functional literacy. Psychological models of specific skills taught in school are reviewed, and implications for testing are drawn. Achievement tests can be constructed by sampling a faceted item domain embedded in a broader domain of intended but untested instructional outcomes. Studies probing the relation of test performance to this broader domain are then carried out as part of the construct validation. This strategy can yield tests more closely linked to the curriculum, provide information required for defensible standard setting, and rationalize criterion-referenced interpretations for sound research and wise educational policy

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 55, No. 1, 23-46 (1985)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543055001023


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONHome page
J. HATTIE, R. M. JAEGER, and L. BOND
Chapter 11 : Persistent Methodological Questions in Educational Testing
Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1999; 24(1): 393 - 446.
[PDF]


Home page
Language TestingHome page
P. E. Griffin, R. J. Adams, L. Martin, and B. Tomlinson
An algorithmic approach to prescriptive assessment in English as a Second Language
Language Testing, June 1, 1988; 5(1): 1 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
T. J. Crooks
The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1988; 58(4): 438 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
E. Haertel
The Valid Use of Student Performance Measures for Teacher Evaluation
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, January 1, 1986; 8(1): 45 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]



RER home page AER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page