Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Educational Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

A Framework for the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Adjunct Questions and Objectives

Richard J. Hamilton

Wright State University

Recent formulations in cognitive psychology have significantly modified our view of the prose learning process. Both the structure of the prose passage and learner characteristics have been shown to consistently influence the learning of prose. Given these recent formulations, a reevaluation of the research on the effectiveness of adjunct aids in a prose learning setting should provide for a better understanding of the usefulness of these aids. The present article evaluates the effectiveness of adjunct questions and objectives in a prose learning setting. A framework that includes the above formulations is used to organize and direct the analysis and discussion of results. The framework proved to be very useful in (a) the identification of processes responsible for the effects of the two adjunct aids, (b) the explanation of unusual and/or discrepant results, and (c) the generation of recommendation for future research

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 55, No. 1, 47-85 (1985)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543055001047


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
O. Kim, B. J. Utke, and S. C. Hupp
Comparing the Use of Case Studies and Application Questions in Preparing Special Education Professionals
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, January 1, 2005; 28(2): 104 - 113.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
T. J. Crooks
The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1988; 58(4): 438 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
R. J. Hamilton
Role of Adjunct Questions and Subject Ability Levels on the Learning of Concepts from Prose
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1986; 23(1): 87 - 94.
[Abstract] [PDF]



RER home page AER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page