Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Educational Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, B. Y. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Self-Questioning Instructional Research: A Review

Bernice Y. L. Wong

Simon Fraser University

Studies in self-questioning designed to improve students’ prose processing are reviewed in the context of theoretical issues and instructional implications that stem from three theoretical perspectives: the active processing perspective, metacognitive theory, and schema theory. The review indicates that the effects of self-questioning training on students’ prose processing are successful. Moreover, it indicates the need to consider the issue of constraints in self-questioning. The constraints of content knowledge and metacognitive deficiencies on self-questioning are illustrated. Subsequently, methodological problems underlying instructional failures in self-questioning research are examined. These include level of criterion in training, processing time allowed the subjects, explicitness in instruction, and maintenance and transfer tests. Last, potential directions of future research are discussed.

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 55, No. 2, 227-268 (1985)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543055002227


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. D. Roscoe and M. T. H. Chi
Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors' Explanations and Questions
Review of Educational Research, December 1, 2007; 77(4): 534 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
A.-H. Kim, S. Vaughn, J. K. Klingner, A. L. Woodruff, C. Klein Reutebuch, and K. Kouzekanani
Improving the Reading Comprehension of Middle School Students With Disabilities Through Computer-Assisted Collaborative Strategic Reading
Remedial and Special Education, August 1, 2006; 27(4): 235 - 249.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
B. Rosenshine, C. Meister, and S. Chapman
Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of the Intervention Studies
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1996; 66(2): 181 - 221.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
A. S. Bashir and A. Scavuzzo
Children with Language Disorders: Natural History and Academic Success
J Learn Disabil, January 1, 1992; 25(1): 53 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
A. King
Comparison of Self-Questioning, Summarizing, and Notetaking-Review as Strategies for Learning From Lectures
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1992; 29(2): 303 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
L. K.S. Chan
Promoting Strategy Generalization Through Self-Instructional Training in Students with Reading Disabilities
J Learn Disabil, August 1, 1991; 24(7): 427 - 433.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. L. Bangert-Drowns, C.-L. C. Kulik, J. A. Kulik, and M. Morgan
The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-Like Events
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1991; 61(2): 213 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Intervention in School and ClinicHome page
E. S. Ellis
A Model for Assessing Cognitive Reading Strategies
Intervention in School and Clinic, March 1, 1989; 24(4): 407 - 423.
[PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
E. P. Haller, D. A. Child, and H. J. Walberg
Can Comprehension Be Taught?: A Quantitative Synthesis of "Metacognitive" Studies
Educational Researcher, December 1, 1988; 17(9): 5 - 8.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
M. Pressley, C. J. Johnson, and S. Symons
Elaborating to Learn and Learning to Elaborate
J Learn Disabil, February 1, 1987; 20(2): 76 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
M. A. Mastropieri, T. E. Scruggs, and J. R. Levin
Learning-Disabled Students' Memory for Expository Prose: Mnemonic Versus Nonmnemonic Pictures
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1987; 24(4): 505 - 519.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
E. B. Ryan, E. J. Short, and K. A. Weed
The Role of Cognitive Strategy Training in Improving the Academic Performance of Learning Disabled Children
J Learn Disabil, November 1, 1986; 19(9): 521 - 529.
[Abstract] [PDF]



RER home page AER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page