Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Educational Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoge, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The Validity of Direct Observation Measures of Pupil Classroom Behavior

Robert D. Hoge

Carleton University

An evaluation of the validity of direct observation measures of pupil classroom behaviors is presented. The evaluation is based on a survey of analyses bearing on their construct, criterion-related, and treatment validities. Three types of measures are discussed. These include molar measures, where the focus is on broad dimensions of classroom behavior (e.g., "on-task" vs. "off-task"), molecular measures, where the focus is on more specific dimensions of behavior, and molecular-composite measures, where the data are collected in terms of molecular units but scored in terms of composite categories. Consistent support for the validity of molar and molecular-composite types of measures was revealed, but support for the molecular schedules was less consistent. The paper also contains a set of recommendations for users of these instruments and some suggestions for future research on the measures.

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 55, No. 4, 469-483 (1985)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543055004469


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in Crime and DelinquencyHome page
M. T. ZINGRAFF, J. LEITER, M. C. JOHNSEN, and K. A. MYERS
The Mediating Effect of Good School Performance on the Maltreatment-Delinquency Relationship
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, February 1, 1994; 31(1): 62 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
R. A. McWILLIAM and W. B. WARE
The Reliability of Observations of Young Children's Engagement: An Application of Generalizability Theory
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1994; 18(1): 34 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
W. S. Barnett, C. M. Escobar, and M. T. Ravsten
Parent and Clinic Early Intervention for Children With Language Handicaps: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Journal of Early Intervention, January 1, 1988; 12(4): 290 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
G. Tindal and R. Parker
Direct Observation in Special Education Classrooms: Concurrent Use of Two Instruments and their Validation
Journal of Special Education, January 1, 1987; 21(2): 43 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]



RER home page AER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page