This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Eylon, B.-S. Articles by Linn, M. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Learning and Instruction: An Examination of Four Research Perspectives in Science Education

The Weizmann Institute of Science

Marcia C. Linn

University of California-Berkeley

Recent research in science education examines learning from four perspectives which we characterize as a concept-learning focus, a developmental focus, a differential focus, and a focus on problem solving. This paper illustrates how these perspectives, considered together offer new insights into the knowledge and reasoning processes of science students and provide a framework for identifying mechanisms governing how individuals change their knowledge and thinking processes. An integrated examination of the four research perspectives strongly suggests that in-depth coverage of several science topics will benefit students far more than fleeting coverage of numerous science topics.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Mastropieri, T. E. Scruggs, J. J. Norland, S. Berkeley, K. McDuffie, E. H. Tornquist, and N. Connors Differentiated Curriculum Enhancement in Inclusive Middle School Science: Effects on Classroom and High-Stakes Tests Journal of Special Education, November 1, 2006; 40(3): 130 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Means, J. Roschelle, W. Penuel, N. Sabelli, and G. Haertel Chapter 5: Technology's Contribution to Teaching and Policy: Efficiency, Standardization, or Transformation? Review of Research in Education, January 1, 2003; 27(1): 159 - 181. [PDF]

				M. C. Linn, C. Lewis, I. Tsuchida, and N. B. Songer Beyond Fourth-Grade Science: Why Do U.S. and Japanese Students Diverge? Educational Researcher, April 1, 2000; 29(3): 4 - 14. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. TUSS From Student to Scientist: An Experiential Approach to Science Education Science Communication, June 1, 1996; 17(4): 443 - 481. [Abstract]

				C. A. Chinn and W. F. Brewer The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1993; 63(1): 1 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. C. Linn Book Reviews: The Art of Multimedia and the State of Education Educational Researcher, January 1, 1992; 21(1): 30 - 32. [PDF]

				M. A. Mastropieri and T. E. Scruggs Science for Students With Disabilities Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1992; 62(4): 377 - 411. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Confrey Chapter 1: A Review of the Research on Student Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming Review of Research in Education, January 1, 1990; 16(1): 3 - 56. [PDF]

				C. Bereiter Aspects of an Educational Learning Theory Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1990; 60(4): 603 - 624. [Abstract] [PDF]