This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Becker, B. J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Coaching for the Scholastic Aptitude Test: Further Synthesis and Appraisal

Michigan State University

Analyses of results of studies documented in 23 reports on coaching for the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) indicated that, on average, coaching can help increase SAT scores. However, considerable variability in results for 48 studies reflected the fact that not all coaching is necessarily effective and that all studies of coaching do not provide similar views of coaching’s effectiveness. Results of published and unpublished studies were analyzed separately. Characteristics related to the magnitudes of coaching effects included date of publication of the study, whether the study was sponsored by the Educational Testing Service and used as a comparison group, whether instruction included test practice and attention to test-taking skills, and whether homework was assigned to students. Coaching effects were stronger for the SAT Mathematical subtest. Published comparison studies gave consistent results with coached groups exceeding controls by 0.09 standard deviations on SAT-V and 0.16 on SAT-M. Studies of coaching were found to be rather poorly reported and designed without much attention to the issues discussed in reviews of the coaching literature.

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 60, No. 3, 373-417 (1990)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543060003373


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. P. Munoz and M. E. Alvarez Washback of an oral assessment system in the EFL classroom Language Testing, January 1, 2010; 27(1): 33 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H.-A. Dang and F. H. Rogers The Growing Phenomenon of Private Tutoring: Does It Deepen Human Capital, Widen Inequalities, or Waste Resources? World Bank Res. Obs., September 1, 2008; 23(2): 161 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Briggs Meta-Analysis: A Case Study Eval Rev, April 1, 2005; 29(2): 87 - 127. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. C. Briggs Causal Inference and the Heckman Model Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2004; 29(4): 397 - 420. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. S. Aiken, S. G. West, D. E. Schwalm, J. L. Carroll, and S. Hsiung Comparison of a Randomized and Two Quasi-Experimental Designs in a Single Outcome Evaluation: Efficacy of a University-Level Remedial Writing Program Eval Rev, April 1, 1998; 22(2): 207 - 244. [Abstract] [PDF]