This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cochran-Smith, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Word Processing and Writing in Elementary Classrooms: A Critical Review of Related Literature

University of Pennsylvania

Word processing has been widely endorsed as one of the most promising uses of microcomputers in the elementary school curriculum. This article reviews the burgeoning literature that pertains to word processing and writing in elementary classrooms by constructing five major propositions that cut across individual studies and methods. Together, the propositions provide a schema for understanding and categorizing what is known and still needs to be known about word processing and young writers, a framework for probing the significant theoretical and substantive issues underlying the findings, and a point of departure for discussing the most provocative themes and questions that emerge from many fields of study. Throughout the review, I demonstrate that using word processing for writing in individual classrooms is a practice that is social as well as technical. I argue, therefore, that we cannot determine how word processing is most effectively used in classrooms apart from the ways particular teachers work in particular instructional contexts and that we cannot understand how word processing affects the quality, quantity, or processes of children’s writing apart from the ways these are embedded within, and mediated by, the social systems of classrooms. I conclude that, although we know a great deal about the capacities of word processing to influence students’ writing, we know much less about the ways this technology is actually introduced and used in school settings over time or the ways these introductions and settings interact with the social processes of classrooms.

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 61, No. 1, 107-155 (1991)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543061001107


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Sturm, J. L. Rankin, D. R. Beukelman, and L. S. Muehling How to Select Appropriate Software for Computer-Assisted Writing Intervention in School and Clinic, January 1, 1997; 32(3): 148 - 161. [PDF]

				C. A. MacArthur Using Technology to Enhance the Writing Processes of Students with Learning Disabilities J Learn Disabil, July 1, 1996; 29(4): 344 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. M. Bahr, N. W. Nelson, and A. M. V. Meter The Effects of Text-Based and Graphics-Based Software Tools on Planning and Organizing of Stories J Learn Disabil, July 1, 1996; 29(4): 355 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Sperling Revisiting the Writing-Speaking Connection: Challenges for Research on Writing and Writing Instruction Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1996; 66(1): 53 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I. Jones and A. D. Pellegrini The Effects of Social Relationships, Writing Media, and Microgenetic Development on First-Grade Students' Written Narratives American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1996; 33(3): 691 - 718. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C.J. Laine and R. Follansbee Using word-prediction technology to improve the writing of low-functioning hearing-impaired students Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 1994; 10(3): 283 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF]