Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Educational Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chinn, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brewer, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction

Clark A. Chinn and William F. Brewer

Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Understanding how science students respond to anomalous data is essential to understanding knowledge acquisition in science classrooms. This article presents a detailed analysis of the ways in which scientists and science students respond to such data. We postulate that there are seven distinct forms of response to anomalous data, only one of which is to accept the data and change theories. The other six responses involve discounting the data in various ways in order to protect the preinstructional theory. We analyze the factors that influence which of these seven forms of response a scientist or student will choose, giving special attention to the factors that make theory change more likely. Finally, we discuss the implications of our framework for science instruction.

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 63, No. 1, 1-49 (1993)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543063001001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Topics in Early Childhood Special EducationHome page
C. J. Dunst and C. M. Trivette
Using Research Evidence to Inform and Evaluate Early Childhood Intervention Practices
Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, May 1, 2009; 29(1): 40 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional ChildrenHome page
J. L. Goeke
A Preliminary Investigation of Prospective Teachers' Reasoning About Case Studies with Expert Commentary
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, January 1, 2008; 31(1): 21 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Early InterventionHome page
M. Raab and C. J. Dunst
Early Intervention Practitioner Approaches to Natural Environment Interventions
Journal of Early Intervention, October 1, 2004; 27(1): 15 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
S. Alsop
Understanding understanding: a model for the public learning of radioactivity
Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 1999; 8(4): 267 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
D. L. Butler
In Search of the Architect of Learning: A Commentary on Scaffolding as a Metaphor for Instructional Interactions
J Learn Disabil, July 1, 1998; 31(4): 374 - 385.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
T. De Jong and W. R. Van Joolingen
Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1998; 68(2): 179 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
M. M. Kennedy
The Connection Between Research and Practice
Educational Researcher, October 1, 1997; 26(7): 4 - 12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
P. A. Alexander and F. J. R. C. Dochy
Conceptions of Knowledge and Beliefs: A Comparison Across Varying Cultural and Educational Communities
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1995; 32(2): 413 - 442.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
D. L. Butler and P. H. Winne
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1995; 65(3): 245 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
S. Greene and J. M. Ackerman
Expanding the Constructivist Metaphor: A Rhetorical Perspective on Literacy Research and Practice
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1995; 65(4): 383 - 420.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
R. Driver, H. Asoko, J. Leach, P. Scott, and E. Mortimer
Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom
Educational Researcher, October 1, 1994; 23(7): 5 - 12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am Educ Res JHome page
W. D. Copeland, C. Birmingham, L. DeMeulle, M. D'Emidio-Caston, and D. Natal
Making Meaning in Classrooms: An Investigation of Cognitive Processes in Aspiring Teachers, Experienced Teachers, and Their Peers
American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1994; 31(1): 166 - 196.
[Abstract] [PDF]



RER home page AER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page