This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bangert-Drowns, R. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Word Processor as an Instructional Tool: A Meta-Analysis of Word Processing in Writing Instruction

University at Albany, State University of New York

Word processing in writing instruction may provide lasting educational benefits to users because it encourages a fluid conceptualization of text and frees the writer from mechanical concerns. This meta-analysis reviews 32 studies that compared two groups of students receiving identical writing instruction but allowed only one group to use word processing for writing assignments. Word processing groups, especially weaker writers, improved the quality of their writing. Word processing students wrote longer documents but did not have more positive attitudes toward writing. More effective uses of word processing as an instructional tool might include adapting instruction to software strengths and adding metacognitive prompts to the writing program.

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 63, No. 1, 69-93 (1993)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543063001069


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. A. Lange, G. Mulhern, and J. Wylie Proofreading Using an Assistive Software Homophone Tool: Compensatory and Remedial Effects on the Literacy Skills of Students With Reading Difficulties J Learn Disabil, July 1, 2009; 42(4): 322 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. A. Troia Self-Regulation and the Writing Process: Enhancing the Performance of Students With Language and Learning Difficulties Language Learning and Education, March 1, 2009; 16(1): 28 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Ranker Composing Across Multiple Media: A Case Study of Digital Video Production in a Fifth Grade Classroom Written Communication, April 1, 2008; 25(2): 196 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Hollenbeck Validity Issues and Decisions About Testing Accommodations Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2005; 31(1): 7 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Anderson-Inman, C. Knox-Quinn, and M. Szymanski Computer-Supported Studying: Stories of Successful Transition to Postsecondary Education Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, January 1, 1999; 22(2): 185 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. B. Lewis and R. B. Lewis Assistive Technology and Learning Disabilities: Today's Realities and Tomorrow's Promises J Learn Disabil, January 1, 1998; 31(1): 16 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. A. MacArthur Using Technology to Enhance the Writing Processes of Students with Learning Disabilities J Learn Disabil, July 1, 1996; 29(4): 344 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. M. Bahr, N. W. Nelson, and A. M. V. Meter The Effects of Text-Based and Graphics-Based Software Tools on Planning and Organizing of Stories J Learn Disabil, July 1, 1996; 29(4): 355 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]