This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kane, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Validating the Performance Standards Associated With Passing Scores

University of Wisconsin, Madison

The validity of test-based decisions about readiness for a course or a profession depends on the appropriateness of the passing scores used to make the decisions. The interpretation of passing scores, based on judgments about items or examinees, in terms of some standard of performance depends on two assumptions: (a) that the passing score corresponds to the specified performance standard, in the sense that examinees with scores above the passing score are likely to meet the standard and examinees with scores below the passing score are not likely to meet the standard, and (b) that the specified performance standard is reasonable given the purpose of the decision. These two assumptions can be evaluated in terms of the match between the procedures used to set the passing scores and the purpose of the decision, the internal consistency of the results, and comparisons to external criteria. The sources of error in the passing score can be identified by examining these two assumptions.

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 64, No. 3, 425-461 (1994)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543064003425


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Lee and D. M. Lewis A Generalizability Theory Approach to Standard Error Estimates for Bookmark Standard Settings Educational and Psychological Measurement, August 1, 2008; 68(4): 603 - 620. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Ping Yin and J. Sconing Estimating Standard Errors of Cut Scores for Item Rating and Mapmark Procedures: A Generalizability Theory Approach Educational and Psychological Measurement, February 1, 2008; 68(1): 25 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. W. McKinley, J. R. Boulet, and R. K. Hambleton A Work-Centered Approach for Setting Passing Scores on Performance-Based Assessments Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2005; 28(3): 349 - 369. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Violato, A. Marini, and C. Lee A Validity Study Of Expert Judgment Procedures For Setting Cutoff Scores On High-Stakes Credentialing Examinations Using Cluster Analysis Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2003; 26(1): 59 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Janssen, F. Tuerlinckx, M. Meulders, and P. De Boeck A Hierarchical IRT Model for Criterion-Referenced Measurement Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, January 1, 2000; 25(3): 285 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. R. Davidson and K. W. Howell State Standards: Authenticity vs. Diversity Assessment for Effective Intervention, April 1, 1997; 22(3): 164 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]