This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Smagorinsky, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Social Construction of Data: Methodological Problems of Investigating Learning in the Zone of Proximal Development

University of Oklahoma

Educational researchers have traditionally drawn on procedures and metaphors from the hard sciences to guide their thinking about methodological issues. One frequently invoked metaphor is that of the purity of data, which a researcher can contaminate through the process of investigation. This article questions the appropriateness of the purity metaphor, using a perspective provided by Vygotsky’s notion of the zone of proximal development (ZPD) and its emphasis on a genetic method in which development is mediated by cultural tools and signs. Methodological problems emerging from this conception of the ZPD—including problems of defining research, identifying an appropriate unit of analysis, considering the relationship between evidence and telos (an optimal sense of development), and accounting for the mediational role of assessment—are reviewed. Finally, the work of Luria (1976) is examined from the neo-Vygotskian perspective developed in this article.

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 65, No. 3, 191-212 (1995)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543065003191


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Smagorinsky The Method Section as Conceptual Epicenter in Constructing Social Science Research Reports Written Communication, July 1, 2008; 25(3): 389 - 411. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Matusov Applying a Sociocultural Approach to Vygotskian Academia: `Our Tsar Isn't Like Yours, and Yours Isn't Like Ours' Culture Psychology, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 5 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. S. Bradley Commentary: The Vygotskian Family in the Supreme Court of Practice Culture Psychology, March 1, 2008; 14(1): 37 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Smagorinsky, M. Zoss, and P. M. Reed Residential Interior Design as Complex Composition: A Case Study of a High School Senior's Composing Process Written Communication, July 1, 2006; 23(3): 295 - 330. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Smagorinsky, L. S. Cook, C. Moore, A. Y. Jackson, and P. G. Fry Tensions in Learning to Teach: Accommodation and the Development of a Teaching Identity Journal of Teacher Education, January 1, 2004; 55(1): 8 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. S. Popkewitz Dewey, Vygotsky, and the Social Administration of the Individual: Constructivist Pedagogy as Systems of Ideas in Historical Spaces American Educational Research Journal, January 1, 1998; 35(4): 535 - 570. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. SMAGORINSKY Personal Growth in Social Context: A High School Senior's Search for Meaning in and Through Writing Written Communication, January 1, 1997; 14(1): 63 - 105. [Abstract]