This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cooper, H. Articles by Dorr, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Race Comparisons on Need for Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Alternative to Graham’s Narrative Review

University of Missouri–Columbia

A box score review conducted by Graham (1994) concluded that no difference existed between Blacks and Whites on measures of need for achievement. A meta-analysis reported in this article using the same research base revealed reliable and complex race differences. Overall, Whites scored higher than Blacks on measures of need for achievement, but the race difference all but disappeared in studies conducted after 1970. As a possible explanation, the meta-analysis revealed that since 1970 samples of participants from various socioeconomic levels have been preferred and that such samples showed differences between races of only half the size of those shown for samples of participants of strictly lower socioeconomic status. The method of assessment and the age and education of participants also influenced outcomes of race comparisons. Finally, Graham concluded that the research showed a consistent pattern of more positive self-concept of ability among Blacks than Whites. The meta-analysis also found this effect but revealed it to be smaller (though nonsignificantly so) than the difference in need for achievement rejected by the box score. Thus, the meta-analysis found that effects are no larger in an area where Graham concluded they existed than in an area where she concluded they did not.

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 65, No. 4, 483-508 (1995)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543065004483


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Veenman Effects of Multigrade and Multi-Age Classes Reconsidered Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1996; 66(3): 323 - 340. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Graham Narrative Versus Meta-Analytic Reviews of Race Differences in Motivation: A Comment on Cooper and Dorr Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1995; 65(4): 509 - 514. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Cooper and N. Dorr Narrative Versus Meta-Analytic Reviews: A Rejoinder to Graham's Comment Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1995; 65(4): 515 - 517. [Abstract] [PDF]