|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Review of Educational Research, Vol. 66, No. 1,
5-32 (1996)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543066001005
Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Rewards: A Commentary on Cameron and Pierces Meta-Analysis
Mark R. Lepper,
Mark Keavney and
Michael Drake
Stanford University
This article provides a critical analysis of Cameron and Pierces (1994) meta-analytic review of the experimental literature on the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. It is suggested that Cameron and Pierces overly simplistic conclusion has little theoretical or practical value and is instead the direct consequence of their systematic and consistent misuse of meta-analytic procedures. A more nuanced analysis of the several different processes by which extrinsic rewards may affect motivation is also offered.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. L. Heward
Ten Faulty Notions About Teaching and Learning That Hinder the Effectiveness of Special Education
Journal of Special Education,
January 1, 2003;
36(4):
186 - 205.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Wigfield, J. S. Eccles, and D. Rodriguez
Chapter 3: The Development of Children's Motivation in School Contexts
Review of Research in Education,
January 1, 1998;
23(1):
73 - 118.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kohn
By All Available Means: Cameron and Pierce's Defense of Extrinsic Motivators
Review of Educational Research,
January 1, 1996;
66(1):
1 - 4.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci
When Paradigms Clash: Comments on Cameron and Pierce's Claim That Rewards Do Not Undermine Intrinsic Motivation
Review of Educational Research,
January 1, 1996;
66(1):
33 - 38.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Cameron and W. D. Pierce
The Debate About Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation: Protests and Accusations Do Not Alter the Results
Review of Educational Research,
January 1, 1996;
66(1):
39 - 51.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|