|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis
Yiping Lou and
Philip C. Abrami
Concordia University
John C. Spence
University of Alberta
Catherine Poulsen,
Bette Chambers and
Sylvia dApollonia
Concordia University
The effects of within-class grouping on student achievement and other outcomes were quantitatively integrated using two sets of study findings. The first set included 145 effect sizes and explored the effects of grouping versus no grouping on several outcomes. Overall, the average achievement effect size was +0.17, favoring small-group learning. The second set included 20 effect sizes which directly compared the achievement effects of homogeneous versus heterogeneous ability grouping. Overall, the results favored homogeneous grouping; the average effect size was +0.12. The variability in both sets of study findings was heterogeneous, and the effects were explored further. To be maximally effective, within-class grouping practices require the adaptation of instruction methods and materials for small-group learning.
Review of Educational Research, Vol. 66, No. 4,
423-458 (1996)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543066004423

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Hong and Y. Hong
Reading Instruction Time and Homogeneous Grouping in Kindergarten: An Application of Marginal Mean Weighting Through Stratification
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
March 1, 2009;
31(1):
54 - 81.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Scott-Ladd and C. C.A. Chan
Using action research to teach students to manage team learning and improve teamwork satisfaction
Active Learning in Higher Education,
November 1, 2008;
9(3):
231 - 248.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Gillies
The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Junior High School Students' Behaviours, Discourse and Learning During a Science-Based Learning Activity
School Psychology International,
July 1, 2008;
29(3):
328 - 347.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Robinson
Evidence of a Differential Effect of Ability Grouping on the Reading Achievement Growth of Language-Minority Hispanics
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,
June 1, 2008;
30(2):
141 - 180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Neihart
The Socioaffective Impact of Acceleration and Ability Grouping: Recommendations for Best Practice
Gifted Child Quarterly,
January 1, 2007;
51(4):
330 - 341.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. B. Rogers
Lessons Learned About Educating the Gifted and Talented: A Synthesis of the Research on Educational Practice
Gifted Child Quarterly,
January 1, 2007;
51(4):
382 - 396.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. I. Gitelman
Estimating Causal Effects From Multilevel Group-Allocation Data
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics,
January 1, 2005;
30(4):
397 - 412.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Vaughn and S. Linan-Thompson
What Is Special About Special Education for Students with Learning Disabilities?
Journal of Special Education,
November 1, 2003;
37(3):
140 - 147.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Vaughn, S. Linan-Thompson, K. Kouzekanani, D. Pedrotty Bryant, S. Dickson, and S. A. Blozis
Reading Instruction Grouping for Students with Reading Difficulties
Remedial and Special Education,
October 1, 2003;
24(5):
301 - 315.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Simmerman and H. L. Swanson
Treatment Outcomes for Students with Learning Disabilities: How Important Are Internal and External Validity?
J Learn Disabil,
May 1, 2001;
34(3):
221 - 236.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Vaughn, M. T. Hughes, S. W. Moody, and B. Elbaum
Instructional Grouping for Reading for Students with LD: Implications for Practice
Intervention in School and Clinic,
January 1, 2001;
36(3):
131 - 137.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. R. Antil, J. R. Jenkins, S. K. Wayne, and P. F. Vadasy
Cooperative Learning: Prevalence, Conceptualizations, and the Relation Between Research and Practice
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 1998;
35(3):
419 - 454.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Webb, K. M. Nemer, A. W. Chizhik, and B. Sugrue
Equity Issues in Collaborative Group Assessment: Group Composition and Performance
American Educational Research Journal,
January 1, 1998;
35(4):
607 - 651.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|