Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Educational Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Popkewitz, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

The Culture of Redemption and the Administration of Freedom as Research

Thomas S. Popkewitz

University of Wisconsin–Madison

This essay focuses on the systems of "reason" in the educational sciences. It examines today's image of the constructivist teacher and child who, from different ideological agendas, collaborate and "construct knowledge" in a decentralized system of education. This image, it is argued, is an effect of power. It functions historically as a governing practice that links political rationalities about progress to the construction of individual identities. Contemporary research inscribes a 19th-century premise that the purpose of research is the social administration of the subjects (and subjectivities). This administration embodies a redemptive culture that promises empowerment and emancipation, but the particular scaffolding of ideas functions to consolidate and conceal power relations as the educational sciences inscribe "action," "practice," and "the soul."

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 68, No. 1, 1-34 (1998)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543068001001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Leadership and Organizational StudiesHome page
P. J. Bettis, M. Mills, J. M. Williams, and R. Nolan
Faculty in a Liminal Landscape: A Case Study of a College Reorganization
Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, January 1, 2005; 11(3): 47 - 61.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERHome page
A. Schutz
Rethinking Domination and Resistance: Challenging Postmodernism
Educational Researcher, January 1, 2004; 33(1): 15 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Advances in Developing Human ResourcesHome page
Y.-S. Kim
Learning One's Way to Implementing Learning Teams in Korea: The Relationship Between Team Learning and Power in Organizations
Advances in Developing Human Resources, February 1, 2003; 5(1): 64 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
L. J. Cary
Unexpected Stories: Life History and the Limits of Representation
Qualitative Inquiry, September 1, 1999; 5(3): 411 - 427.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
T. S. Popkewitz
Reviewing Reviews: RER, Research, and the Politics of Educational Knowledge
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 1999; 69(4): 397 - 405.
[PDF]



RER home page AER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page