|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Statistical Practices of Educational Researchers: An Analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA Analyses
H. J. Keselman
University of Manitoba
Carl J. Huberty
University of Georgia
Lisa M. Lix
Private Scholar
Stephen Olejnik
University of Georgia
Robert A. Cribbie
University of Manitoba
Barbara Donahue
University of Georgia
Rhonda K. Kowalchuk
University of Manitoba
Laureen L. Lowman
University of Georgia
Martha D. Petoskey
University of Georgia
Joanne C. Keselman
University of Manitoba
Joel R. Levin
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Articles published in several prominent educational journals were examined to investigate the use of data analysis tools by researchers in four research paradigms: between-subjects univariate designs, between-subjects multivariate designs, repeated measures designs, and covariance designs. In addition to examining specific details pertaining to the research design (e.g., sample size, group size equality/inequality) and methods employed for data analysis, the authors also catalogued whether (a) validity assumptions were examined, (b) effect size indices were reported, (c) sample sizes were selected on the basis of power considerations, and (d) appropriate textbooks and/or articles were cited to communicate the nature of the analyses that were performed. The present analyses imply that researchers rarely verify that validity assumptions are satisfied and that, accordingly, they typically use analyses that are nonrobust to assumption violations. In addition, researchers rarely report effect size statistics, nor do they routinely perform power analyses to determine sample size requirements. Recommendations are offered to rectify these shortcomings.
Review of Educational Research, Vol. 68, No. 3,
350-386 (1998)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543068003350

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. F. Dedrick, J. M. Ferron, M. R. Hess, K. Y. Hogarty, J. D. Kromrey, T. R. Lang, J. D. Niles, and R. S. Lee
Multilevel Modeling: A Review of Methodological Issues and Applications
Review of Educational Research,
March 1, 2009;
79(1):
69 - 102.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. I. Parker, S. Hagan-Burke, and K. Vannest
Percentage of All Non-Overlapping Data (PAND): An Alternative to PND
Journal of Special Education,
February 1, 2007;
40(4):
194 - 204.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. K. Henson
Effect-Size Measures and Meta-Analytic Thinking in Counseling Psychology Research
The Counseling Psychologist,
September 1, 2006;
34(5):
601 - 629.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. G. Aldana, W. R. Whitmer, R. Greenlaw, A. L. Avins, D. Thomas, A. Salberg, A. Greenwell, L. Lipsenthal, and G. W. Fellingham
Effect of Intense Lifestyle Modification and Cardiac Rehabilitation on Psychosocial Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors and Quality of Life
Behav Modif,
July 1, 2006;
30(4):
507 - 525.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. V. Seco, M. C. Izquierdo, M. P. F. Garcia, and F. J. H. Diez
A Comparison of the Bootstrap-F, Improved General Approximation, and Brown-Forsythe Multivariate Approaches in a Mixed Repeated Measures Design
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
February 1, 2006;
66(1):
35 - 62.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Wilcox
An Approach to Ancova that Allows Multiple Covariates, Nonlinearity, and Heteroscedasticity
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
June 1, 2005;
65(3):
442 - 450.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. K. Kowalchuk, H. J. Keselman, J. Algina, and R. D. Wolfinger
The Analysis of Repeated Measurements with Mixed-Model Adjusted F Tests
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
April 1, 2004;
64(2):
224 - 242.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Cribbie and H. J. Keselman
The Effects of Nonnormality on Parametric, Nonparametric, and Model Comparison Approaches to Pairwise Comparisons
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
August 1, 2003;
63(4):
615 - 635.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Finch, N. Thomason, and G. Cumming
Past and Future American Psychological Association Guidelines for Statistical Practice
Theory Psychology,
December 1, 2002;
12(6):
825 - 853.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Guimond and M. Dambrun
When Prosperity Breeds Intergroup Hostility: The Effects of Relative Deprivation and Relative Gratification on Prejudice
Pers Soc Psychol Bull,
July 1, 2002;
28(7):
900 - 912.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Keselman, R. A. Cribbie, and R. R. Wilcox
Pairwise Multiple Comparison Tests when Data are Nonnormal
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
June 1, 2002;
62(3):
420 - 434.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Hooper, C. W. Swartz, M. B. Wakely, R. E. L. de Kruif, and J. W. Montgomery
Executive Functions in Elementary School Children With and Without Problems in Written Expression
J Learn Disabil,
January 1, 2002;
35(1):
57 - 68.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J B. Feland, J W. Myrer, S. S Schulthies, G. W Fellingham, and G. W Measom
The Effect of Duration of Stretching of the Hamstring Muscle Group for Increasing Range of Motion in People Aged 65 Years or Older
Physical Therapy,
May 1, 2001;
81(5):
1110 - 1117.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Kirk
Promoting Good Statistical Practices: Some Suggestions
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
April 1, 2001;
61(2):
213 - 218.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Keselman, J. Algina, R. R. Wilcox, and R. K. Kowa
Testing Repeated Measures Hypotheses When Covariance Matrices are Heterogeneous: Revisiting the Robustness of the Welch-James Test Again
Educational and Psychological Measurement,
December 1, 2000;
60(6):
925 - 938.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Vacha-Haase, J. E. Nilsson, D. R. Reetz, T. S. Lance, and B. Thompson
Reporting Practices and APA Editorial Policies Regarding Statistical Significance and Effect Size
Theory Psychology,
June 1, 2000;
10(3):
413 - 425.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Thompson
Statistical Significance Tests, Effect Size Reporting and the Vain Pursuit of Pseudo-Objectivity
Theory Psychology,
April 1, 1999;
9(2):
191 - 196.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|