Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Educational Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Negative Effects of Reward on Intrinsic Motivation—A Limited Phenomenon: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (2001)

Judy Cameron

University of Alberta

A major concern in educational settings is that the use of rewards and incentives may destroy students’ intrinsic motivation to perform activities. In collaboration with other researchers, the author conducted a meta-analysis of the literature that showed that negative effects of reward were limited and easily avoidable (Cameron & Pierce, 1994; Eisenberger & Cameron, 1996). Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (2001) suggest that our work was seriously flawed; they present a summary of their meta-analysis on the topic (Deci, Koestner, & Ryan, 1999a) and claim that rewards do substantially undermine intrinsic interest. In this comment, it is argued that there is no inherent negative property of reward. By organizing studies according to cognitive evaluation theory, Deci et al. (1999a) collapsed across distinct reward procedures and were able to obtain pervasive negative effects. When studies are organized according to the actual procedures used, however, negative effects are limited to a specific set of circumstances.

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 71, No. 1, 29-42 (2001)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543071001029


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesHome page
K. Gow, C. Hinschen, D. Anthony, and C. Warren
Work expectations and other factors influencing male apprentices' intentions to quit their trade
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, April 1, 2008; 46(1): 99 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Pers Soc Psychol BullHome page
T. Greitemeyer and B. Weiner
Asymmetrical Attributions for Approach Versus Avoidance Behavior
Pers Soc Psychol Bull, November 1, 2003; 29(11): 1371 - 1382.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
E. L. Deci, R. M. Ryan, and R. Koestner
The Pervasive Negative Effects of Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation: Response to Cameron (2001)
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2001; 71(1): 43 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]



RER home page AER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page