Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Educational Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chatterji, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Models and Methods for Examining Standards-Based Reforms and Accountability Initiatives: Have the Tools of Inquiry Answered Pressing Questions on Improving Schools?

Madhabi Chatterji

Teachers College, Columbia University

This article synthesizes research on standards-based reforms and accountability, with specific attention to purposes, models, and methods of inquiry. Starting with the premise that the reforms were meant to be systemic, the article examines the extent to which studies were guided by designs that explicitly or implicitly acknowledge a system, and evaluates the utility of the designs in generating information to support large-scale systemic changes in education. The article concludes that research efforts on reforms have been largely non-systemic in design and have thereby failed to adequately help individual schools, school systems, and statewide systems to develop in directions that are consistent with the mission of the reform movement.

Key Words: evaluation models and methods • reforms • standards

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 72, No. 3, 345-386 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543072003345


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Special EducationHome page
S. Sood and A. K. Jitendra
A Comparative Analysis of Number Sense Instruction in Reform-Based and Traditional Mathematics Textbooks
Journal of Special Education, November 1, 2007; 41(3): 145 - 157.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Remedial and Special EducationHome page
D. L. Voltz and C. Fore III
Urban Special Education in the Context of Standards-Based Reform
Remedial and Special Education, December 1, 2006; 27(6): 329 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Assessment for Effective InterventionHome page
A. K. Jitendra, A. Deatline-Buchman, and E. Sczesniak
A Comparative Analysis of Third-Grade Mathematics Textbooks Before and After the 2000 NCTM Standards
Assessment for Effective Intervention, January 1, 2005; 30(2): 47 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Learn DisabilHome page
T. V. Mariage, D. J. Paxton-Buursma, and E. C. Bouck
Interanimation: Repositioning Possibilities in Educational Contexts
J Learn Disabil, December 1, 2004; 37(6): 534 - 549.
[Abstract] [PDF]



RER home page AER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page