Review of Educational Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Odell, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Review of Educational Research, Vol. 72, No. 3, 481-546 (2002)
DOI: 10.3102/00346543072003481
© 2002 American Educational Research Association

Articles

Mentored Learning to Teach According to Standards-Based Reform: A Critical Review

Jian Wang and Sandra J. Odell

University of Nevada, Las Vegas

This article analyzes literature on mentored learning to teach in ways consistent with the standards reform movement. It suggests that although reformers encourage mentoring for standards-based teaching, the assumptions underlying mentoring programs are often focused not on standards but on emotional and technical support. Mentoring practices are consistent with program assumptions rather than with the assumptions underlying standards-based teaching. Mentoring practices promote novices’ retention but may not support their learning to teach. Although mentoring practices alone cannot be expected to reform teaching, case studies can illustrate practices for novices learning to teach in reform-minded ways. We argue that policymakers need to find effective ways to educate mentoring program developers and that mentors and researchers need to explore the content and process of reform-minded mentoring.

Key Words: literature review • standards-based teaching • teacher learning • teacher mentoring


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Teacher EducationHome page
Jian Wang, S. J. Odell, and S. A. Schwille
Effects of Teacher Induction on Beginning Teachers' Teaching: A Critical Review of the Literature
Journal of Teacher Education, April 1, 2008; 59(2): 132 - 152.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
E. A. Davis, D. Petish, and J. Smithey
Challenges New Science Teachers Face
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2006; 76(4): 607 - 651.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NASSP BulletinHome page
D. L. Bickmore, S. T. Bickmore, and L. E. Hart
Interdisciplinary Teaming as an Induction Practice
NASSP Bulletin, September 1, 2005; 89(644): 30 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]



RER home page AER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page