Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Review of Educational Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slavin, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lake, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Articles

Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis

Robert E. Slavin and Cynthia Lake

Johns Hopkins University

This article reviews research on the achievement outcomes of three types of approaches to improving elementary mathematics: mathematics curricula, computer-assisted instruction (CAI), and instructional process programs. Study inclusion requirements included use of a randomized or matched control group, a study duration of at least 12 weeks, and achievement measures not inherent to the experimental treatment. Eighty-seven studies met these criteria, of which 36 used random assignment to treatments. There was limited evidence supporting differential effects of various mathematics textbooks. Effects of CAI were moderate. The strongest positive effects were found for instructional process approaches such as forms of cooperative learning, classroom management and motivation programs, and supplemental tutoring programs. The review concludes that programs designed to change daily teaching practices appear to have more promise than those that deal primarily with curriculum or technology alone.

Key Words: best-evidence syntheses • elementary mathematics • experiments • meta-analysis • reviews of research

Review of Educational Research, Vol. 78, No. 3, 427-515 (2008)
DOI: 10.3102/0034654308317473


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSISHome page
R. Slavin and D. Smith
The Relationship Between Sample Sizes and Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews in Education
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, December 1, 2009; 31(4): 500 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. E. Slavin, C. Lake, B. Chambers, A. Cheung, and S. Davis
Effective Reading Programs for the Elementary Grades: A Best-Evidence Synthesis
Review of Educational Research, December 1, 2009; 79(4): 1391 - 1466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
R. E. Slavin, C. Lake, and C. Groff
Effective Programs in Middle and High School Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis
Review of Educational Research, June 1, 2009; 79(2): 839 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



RER home page AER home page EPA home page JEB home page RRE home page